From the blog "Alexandra Grant vs Parker: Framework for a Wrongful Conviction":
With
her connection to Reeve and the PR articles published over the past two
years, Alexandra Grant meets the legal criteria of a limited public
figure.
Alexandra
Grant claimed that lies were written about her by Parker but yet did
not pursue a defamation lawsuit because she is required to prove 4
things and the first one itself, that the statements made about her are
false. Most of what has been written is not false. Alexandra Grant did
lie on her resume and in interviews and these things were written about
her online by me and many other people.
A
defamation lawsuit can also be countered with an anti-SLAPP motion.
Grant chooses the restraining order route as it allows hearsay proving
herself to be a lying sociopath who wasn't looking to stop someone from
stalking or harassing her but from writing the truth about her which
could ruin her scheme to make a living selling love products and to sell
love products, she cannot be known as a liar, but she is a liar and
this is her fault. If your art isn't at the permanent collection of the
Art Gallery of Ontario, why lie about it? I can only conclude that
Alexandra Grant is a sociopath who has no shame, no conscience, no moral
or concept of what is right and wrong or decent and will lie, scam and
commit perjury in court all to satisfy her fragile and delusional ego.
#alexandragrant #grantalexandra #conartist #narcissist
#keanureeves #xartistsbooks #grantloveproject #cancelkeanureeves
#cancelalexandragrant #cancelevil #marfainvitational #artreview #arts
#artisticintegrity #artist #ochigallery #artcollector #artdealer
#artcritic #artfair #charityfraud #contemporaryart #artmuseum
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.