Targeted Harassment vs Targeted False Advertisement

 Continued from: Criticism with a legitimate purpose: The new FAQ on GrantLOVE website (rosescented111.blogspot.com)

The biggest joke from the updated FAQ on GrantLOVE website is the claim that Alexandra Grant created job opportunities for multiple artists, printers, and fabricators and she is offering a free license of the LOVE symbol to create LOVE branded items. Last I check, there are several objection to her trademark applications for various items.

As for providing jobs to artists & other people, if you look at the people she has collaborated with, Alexandra Grant receives the most benefit from it.

The quilt was made by a very talented person & all that Grant offers was her unoriginal logo with questionable trademark status. If the person received 100% profit from this deal, Grant’s logo is still being promoted. If Grant is taking even 10% of the profit, the person is getting the short ends of the deal.

Cachetejack was another artist that Grant collaborates with and they do not need a job from her, the person who received three PPP loans.

Cachetejack has done work with big corporation like Burger King. Alexandra Grant has been sued by a big corporation, Cartier. All the so-called collaboration is her way of using people to promote herself, her logo and business.

Alexandra Grant has practiced a decade of deception through verbiage, PR articles, and actions. She claimed to be inspired by Newman Own brand who donates 100% of their profit. There are people who may have assumed that GrantLOVE also donates 100% of their profit, not just whatever portion she decides to donate & get tax deductible credit for it.

Let’s not forget that she puts on her resume that GrantLOVE is a non-profit and she made update to her website so that the link to that resume is now broken. This is the act of someone who has been exposed for fraud.

There are article claiming that she operates a non-profit. She participated in FRIEZE fair 2020 and GrantLOVE is listed as a non-profit in their article. The new clarification is nothing more than covering up her exposed fraud and claiming to be a victim when in fact, she has victimized her customers through false advertisement.