Wednesday, February 2, 2022

The new FAQ on GrantLOVE website

The new FAQ on GrantLOVE website seems to be written by a lawyer as a response to criticisms about Alexandra Grant’s fraud and the Notice to Register from the Attorney General office.

Thank you all for reporting Alexandra Grant’s illegal activity to the Attorney General and the fact that she finally registered shows that she was not following the required law to collect money for charity.

It's unfortunate that she refused to be honest that she has been collecting money for charity since 2008 which has been repeatedly reported by Alexandra Grant herself in various articles and on her own website.

The new verbiage and branding on GrantLOVE website are CONTRARY to what Alexandra Grant has posted and the PR she has perpetuated for the past decade. More deception, false advertising, and consumers fraud. Being ethical and taking responsible doesn’t seem to be Alexandra Grant’s strong suit. Playing victim and pretending to be altruistic is her favorite role. Let’s not pretend that this new verbiage of being targeted for harassment doesn’t have to do with the fact that her unregistered charity was reported to the Attorney General.

Let’s look at this sentence from the FAQ on GrantLOVE: “Alexandra Grant, truly believes in supporting charitable causes.” They forgot to add “Alexandra Grant LOVES talking about her charitable act in PR articles even MORE. Alexandra Grant’s charity BRAND is to be known as a philanthropist without providing proof or following the laws.

And this sentence: “She believes so strongly in the community benefits of art that she personally donates to numerous nonprofits from royalties and other income she receives, after taxes, from her art to support various artists and arts-related nonprofits.” Alexandra Grant claims to donate a portion to charity on many of her product and after paying taxes on her profit, she supposedly donates to a non-profit which mean she is getting tax deduction for this “charitable act.”

Continue Next POST on 
Criticism with a legitimate purpose: Targeted Harassment vs Targeted False Advertisement (rosescented111.blogspot.com)



No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.