What I have learned from this past year: PR articles are selling Alexandra Grant as a feminist, philanthropist, and an acclaimed and successful artist but every articles is tagged with Keanu Reeves name in it. Even though it is supposed to be about Alexandra Grant, Keanu's name is used in the title in most of these articles.
Alexandra Grant is not a feminist or a philanthropist. No feminist would repeatedly use a man's name to give herself worth as a human being and an artist. A philanthropist would not claim to be running a non-profit that is not registered as a non-profit and this is what Alexandra Grant did with GrantLove. She puts on her resume that Grantloveproject has been a non-profit since 2008 and it was never a non-profit, now or then.
I don't think a successful artist would ask for the PPP loan and Alexandra Grant applied for and received a hand-out from the government.
Keanu Reeves' name was mentioned more times than the name of the Plaintiff, Alexandra Grant during the restraining order trial against Parker.
Draw your own conclusion as to how Keanu Reeves' name is being used to give value to Grant as an artist, a person, a woman and how it helps to falsely convict an innocent woman.
Why is Mr. Humble, the nicest man in Hollywood participating in deception to harm a 68-year-old woman living in a low income housing and who needs a caretaker to help her in her daily life?
Screenshot are from the blog “A Framework for a Wrongful Conviction”:
https://grantvsparker-restrainingorder.blogspot.com/2021/03/post-18-truth-matters-allegations.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.