Something is Not Adding Up

The language of narcissism and self-promotion. Her LOVE trademarked jewelry. According to this statement, the $60,000 comes from her jewelry alone, not in combination with donations and grants. As someone asked earlier, how much jewelry does she have to sell to make that much money? What kind of jewelry exactly did she sell? Necklace? Bracelet? Rings? Gold? Diamond? Silver? Are there evidence of what it looks like or how much they sold for? What was her overhead in making them? Did she deduct the overhead from the $60,000 raised? Has anyone heard of it before? When was it available? Her lawsuit with Cartier was from 2010 to 2012, so wouldn't selling any trademark "caged love" jewelry be on hold at that time? If she could have easily made money from selling jewelry, she wouldn't be needing this "girlfriend" PR stunt. It isn't adding up. If she lied about being on the board of different non-profits, I will bet that she has no problem claiming to have raised money that she did not raise. Transparency? How do we get it? Is Fulcrum require to make the amount collected public knowledge? If anyone understands non-profits and donations rule, please help us with this. What if someone who has donated to the "Love House" was to call and follow-up, will they let us know how much has been collected and if they actually received $60,000 from Alexandra Grant from her jewelry sale?