Including but not LIMITED to...

Looking at the imperative words on the Restraining order: "Including but not LIMITED to..."

So Grant could go to court and provide another list of 100 accounts and claims it's all Parker??? And the request for these accounts is:

"Do not contact or reference the protected party, either directly or indirectly, using social media such as Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, or any other social media platforms. Do not post the protected party's name, face, or likeness on any social media such as Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, or any other social media platforms."

Ridiculous. If the ruling goes through, how do you demand these accounts that don't belong to Parker get closed?

Alexandra Grant, the Narc, has her head up her own ass so high, she has never made sense in her attempt to "brand herself" as the savior of the internet boyfriend, not realizing how inauthentic or ridiculous it looks. 1) Keanu Reeves is the only person that can save himself. 2) The fact that she wants to put her love logo on top of a house exemplifies narcissism at its worst. A Narc cannot, will not and isn't capable of saving anyone. 3) The branding attempts with the hundreds of articles have turned Grant into a public figure, attached to an A-lister so we responded to the fake story being sold to us and she doesn't like our analysis of her, so now she is demanding we do NOT directly or indirectly reference her by claiming these accounts belong to one person.

Come on, the story presented in the media of Grant as a philanthropist with nothing to show is gold for satire and parody. It inspired creativity. Her lies about founding a woman organization she did not found while claiming to be a feminist is her trademark: a feminist that steals, erases, and uses other women for her agenda through lies and propaganda.

Her lawyer for the Cartier lawsuit tried to quit because continuing with the lawsuit was ridiculous and here we have another ridiculous demand as only a Narc can think of.