branding a con artist as a charitable person

I'm noting a few things from the article about Alexandra Grant raising money for charity using her caged love logo. It goes back to the Watts House and her claim of having raised $60,000 for it by selling her trademarked jewelry. The house is incomplete 12 years later and it has been taken over by Fulcrum who is still soliciting donations. With $60,000 and the $25,000 grant from the California Community Fund, it should have been completed years ago. Forgive me if I think the rhetoric of Grant as a philanthropist is a SCAM and nothing more than a BRANDING tool.

https://wwd.com/fashion-news/fashion-scoops/l-a-artist-alexandra-grant-designs-love-necklaces-for-charity-1203623214/

No mention of Reeves as her boyfriend, hmmm... But he is mentioned because, without him, no one would have been interested in Alexandra who, scam artist, Grant.

Does anyone think she got a solo booth at Marfainvational on her own merit or was it through her connection with Keanu? And did the lies on her resume also help? And those articles are written by muck-rack writers with no interest in fact-checking. She did not help found the Women's Center for Creative Work. She does not have an art piece in the collection of the Art Gallery of Ontario.

These necklaces are NOT made with love, honesty, or integrity. It was made by branding a con artist as a charitable person.